Art/Auctions logo
  Contemporary Art Morning Session

Sotheby's New York

10 AM, May 17, 2019

Sale 10070

Dubuffet 108

Lot 108, "Deux Bedouins au Desert," by Jean Dubuffet, gouache on paper mounted on canvas, 12 3/8 by 16 1/4 inches, 1948


By Carter B. Horsley

The Contemporary Art Morning Auction at Christie's New York May 17, 2019 is highlighted by two excellent paintings by Jean Dubuffet, an impressive and large three-part screen by Helen Frankenthaler, a great John Chamberlain sculpture, very good painting by Hans Hofmann and David Hockney, and a very nice early Willem de Kooning.

Lot 108 is a fine gouache on paper mounted on canvas by Jean Dubuffet (1901-1985) that measures 12 3/8 by 16 1/4 inches.  It was painted in 1948 and is entitled "Deux Bedouins au Desert."  It was once owned by Theodore J. Forstmann of New York.  It has an estimate of $200,000 to $300,000.  It sold for $250,000.

Dubuffet  201

Lot 201, "Conjectures," by Jean Dubuffet, acrylic on paper mounted on canvas, 26 1/4 by 39 3/8 inches, 1964


Lot 201 is a vibrant acrylic on paper mounted on canvas by Jean Dubuffet (1901-1985).  Entitled "Conjectures, it measures 26 1/4 by 39 3/8 inches and was painted in 1964.

The catalogue provides the following commentary:

"A jubilant fusion of form and motion, Conjectures, brilliantly exemplifies the visual complexity, vibrancy and creativity which characterizes the very best of Jean Dubuffet’s celebrated oeuvre, made possible by his deliberate rejection of cultural pretensions and unique Art Brut aesthetic. Conjectures, from 1964, executed at the very peak of Dubuffet’s artistic prowess, is rare for its extraordinary kaleidoscopic celebration of color and is from the artist’s most highly esteemed series, titled L’Hourloupe. Conjectures is brimming with energy and is an electrifying, technicolor vision of Dubuffet’s most famous cellular chaos, which he would go on to expand into a vast multi-media universe over the course of the next twelve years. Remarking upon the L’Hourloupe series, Dubuffet explained, "This cycle of work was characterized by a much more seriously arbitrary and irrational mood than anything I had done before. This was a plunge into fantasy, into a phantom parallel universe. My renewed interest in outsider art was no doubt not unconnected with this sudden new development" (the artist quoted in Exh. Cat., Salzburg, Museum de Moderne (and traveling), Jean Dubuffet: Trace of an Adventure, 2003, p. 174).

"Dubuffet left Paris in 1955, abandoning the war-torn city to find solace in the small town of Vence in the South of France. During this period, Dubuffet rejected the presence of human form from his work and turned to nature as the primary source of his investigations through the Texturologies and Materiologies series. Upon his return to Paris in 1961, Dubuffet’s work explored an entirely new world and departure drastically from his explorations of the tactile qualities of organic material so familiar to him in the remoteness of his former rural life. The Paris that Dubuffet returned to was revitalized to a point where optimism and cosmopolitan bustle had replaced the gloom and despondency that had formerly prevailed in the post-war years. Paris’s new joie de vivre atmosphere left Dubuffet creatively intoxicated, which played an immediate, explosive effect on his work, culminating in the exuberant Paris Circus pictures of 1961-1962. The bustling streets, busy restaurants, window displays, and advertising boards of city life came to dominate Dubuffet’s paintings in a way he never before imagined. Where Dubuffet once celebrated the quaintness of life in the countryside, he now celebrated humanity on a grand scale, transforming its energetic spirit into the subject of his art while laying the foundation for his greatest series of works: L’Hourloupe. Dubuffet himself said that, “My art does not seek to include festivities as a distraction from everyday life, but to reveal that everyday life is a much more interesting celebration than the pseudo-celebrations created to distract from it” (The artist quoted in Exh. Cat., Paris, Musée National d’art Moderne, Centre Georges Pompidou, Jean Dubuffet, 2001).

"Dubuffet first embarked on the L’Hourloupe series in 1962 while on long telephone conversations where he would find himself creating mindless doodles made of up forms free of all representation, tightly fitted together in an unbroken web, which he would then mechanically fill with careful striped lines in blue or red ballpoint pen. The result of a simple occupation of the artist’s free hand while the other held the receiver developed into a form of graffiti that soon came to possess an evocative power that captivated the artist for the next twelve years as he continued explored these energetic, cellular forms. For the first time, he felt he had arrived at a mode of representation that was purely neuronal—a way of seeing unfettered by the physical world. The early paintings of L’Hourloupe, such as Conjectures executed in JUNE/MAY 1964, engaged much of the same subject matter as the Paris Circus street scenes, but represented a shift in Dubuffet’s aesthetic dialogue; with increasing simplification, elements and experiences of the real world are eventually transformed into ciphers of the artist’s imagining. Dubuffet’s works from the L'Hourloupe series including Conjectures define themselves as a kind of organic phenomenon, a cellular agitation where the gaze perceives fugitive images in a vast puzzle of ephemeral combinations, suggesting presences, figure or people that fall apart as soon as the gaze fixes them, only adding to the canvas’s palpable energy.

"Bursting with vital energy and frenetic pace, the composition of Conjectures melds together years of Dubuffet’s experiences into an unparalleled amalgamation of form, color, and line which can be traced throughout this expansive oeuvre. In his own words, “Art should always make us laugh and frighten us a little, but never bore us,” which is exactly what Conjectures embodies (Jean Dubuffet, Propsctus aux amateurs de tout genre, Paris 1946, p. 43). Conjectures is a vibrant example from Dubuffet’s artistic output from 1962 to 1974 in which he produced some of the most visually captivating and richly imaginative paintings of his career."


It has an estimate of $600,000 to $800,000.  It sold for $1,040,000.


Frankenthaler 156
Lot 156, "Gateway Screen (Harrison 154.2), by Helen Frankenthaler, 82 by 98 1/4 inches overall, mumber 2 from am edition of 12, 1988

Lot 156 is a virbrant "Gateway Screen (Harrison 154.2)," by Helen Frankenthaler (1928-2011).  It measures 82 by 98 1/4 inches overall and is number 2 from an edition of 12 in 1988.  It is an etching, relief and aquatint printed in colors with hand-stenciling on three panels of handmade TGL paper, each panel encased in a hand-painted patinated cast bronze screen.
The lot has an estimate of $200,000 to $300,000.  It sold for $400,000.

Chamberlain 245

Lot 245, "Paradiddledashboard," John Chamberlain, painted and chrome-plated steel, 60 by 61 by 58 inches, 2007

Lot 245 is a fabulous John Chamberlain sculpture of painted and chrome-plated steel with the memorable title of "Paradiddlebashboard."  It measures 60 by 61 by 58 inches and was created in 2007.  It has an estimate of $300,000 to $400,000.  It failed to sell.


De Kooning  199

Lot 199, "Untitled," by Willem de Kooning, pastel, gouache and charcoal on board, 15 by 20 inches, circa 1942

Lot 199 is a lovely pastel, gouache and charcoal on board by Willem de Kooning (1904-1997).  The untitled work measures 15 by 20 inches and was painted circa 1942.  It has an estimate of $500,000 to $700,000.  It failed to sell.

Hofmann  190

Lot 190, "View from the Balcony," by Hans Hofmann, oil on canvas, 60 by 52 inches, 1964

Lot 190, "View from the Balcony, is a 1964 oil on canvas by Hans Hofmann (1880-1966).  It measures 60 by 52 inches.  It is fromthe colllection of Richard E. Lang andJane Lang Davis of Seattle.

The catalogue provides the following commentary:

"Vigorously exuding a breathless symphony of masterful form and powerful hues, View from the Balcony is a poignant ode to Hans Hofmann’s widely celebrated aesthetic at the apex of his creative energies. Painted in 1964, two years before his death, the present work is a dazzling construction of richly saturated swaths of pigment that encapsulate an equally forceful culmination and reflection on Hofmann’s life’s work. View from the Balcony bears an impressive exhibition history, notably its placement on the cover of Hofmann’s solo exhibition at André Emmerich Gallery in New York as well as its inclusion in the artist’s celebrated retrospective at the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden in Washington, D.C. that same year. These attest to the importance of the present work within Hofmann's oeuvre, as it perfectly captures the artist as both a pioneering colorist and preeminent abstractionist. 


"The rich surface and flawless formal precision in View from the Balcony’s composition lends itself to the energetic innovation of Hofmann’s painterly process, which became especially charged with exuberance in the last decade of his life. Although Hofmann was from an older generation than his Post-War artistic peers, he effectively bridged the School of Paris with the New York Abstract Expressionists by way of artistic innovation and enlightenment. The artist looks to Matisse's kaleidoscopic balcony scenes such as Open Window, Collioure where the view of dancing sailboats shimmers just beyond the vibrantly colored and heavily impastoed interior which brings energy and life to the picture plane pulling the viewing to another place and time. Hofmann’s groundbreaking push-pull thesis is evidenced by the formal structure in View from the Balcony, whereby the composition is made of geometric blocks of richly saturated color, intricately organized within an exacting formal structure. Against the underlayer of burnt orange and cherry red, the carefully layered strata of rich ochre and sugared yellow, simultaneously float towards the viewer and recede inward in the present work, with a rhythmic ethereal quality.  As conveyed by the artist himself: "The movement of a carrier on a flat surface is possibly only through the act of shifting left and right or up and down. To create the phenomenon of push and pull on a flat surface one has to understand that by nature the picture plane reacts automatically in the opposite direction to the stimulus received; thus action continues as long as it received stimulus in the creative process" (the artist cited in William Chapin Seitz, Ed., Hans Hofmann with Selected Writings by the Artist, New York 1963, p. 32).


"Across the surface of View from the Balcony are thin flicks of dazzling blues, luscious pinks, deep reds and warm yellow oil paint, captured within Hofmann’s characteristically tactile and impasto horizontal painting technique—a spatial plane approach he taught for nearly forty years. Although Hofmann had retired from teaching in 1958, the influence of his renowned formal instruction is readily visible by the sheer geometry and collapsing of color and form in View from the Balcony. The Hofmann School of Fine Art in New York was considered the most advanced art school in the nation by 1937, and “Hans Hofmann’s name was legend among the artists hoping to tap the vein that began with Manet and led through Kandinsky, Miró, Matisse and Picasso” (Mary Gabriel, Ninth Street Women, Boston 2018, p. 32). The lustrous, expansive surface of View from the Balcony thus not only heralds the celebration of abstracted color and form, it is the underlying tenet of aesthetic liberation."


The lot has an estimate of $500,000 to $700,000.  It sold for $560,000.


Kline 194

Lot 194, "Untitled," by Franz Kline, oil and pastel on paper, 9 3/4 by 7 1/2 inches, circa 1951


Lot 194 is a good, untitled pastel and oil on paper by Franz Kline (1910-1962.  It measures 9 3/4 by 7 1/2 inches and was painted circa 1951.

It has an estimate of $30,000 to $50,000.  It sold for $362,500.


Gottlieb 197

Lot 197, "Evil Eye," by Adolph Gottlieb, oil on canvas, 34 by 22 inches, 1946

Lot 197, "Evil Eye," is a 1946 oil on canvas by Adolph Gottlieb (1903-1974) that measures 34 by 22 inches.  It was painted in 1946 and was once owned by the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in New York.  It has an estimate of $120,000 to $180,000.  It sold for $262,500.

Hockney 106

Lot 106, "Pool and Pink Pole," by David Hockney, oil on canvas, 21 by 25 inches, 1984


Lot 106 is bright oil on canvas by David Hockney (b. 1939) entitled "Pool and Pink Pole."  It measures 21 by 25 inches and was painted in 1984.

The catalogue provides the following commentary:

"Imbued with the bright glow of California sunshine, Pool and Pink Pole perfectly embodies the emotive depth and peerless formal execution of David Hockney’s oeuvre. This exquisite painting is truly an exceptional example of the rich color palette, complex compositional structure and intimately significant subject matter that characterizes the artist’s most iconic paintings. The mélange of cobalt blues, rose pinks and forest greens testifies to the glorious oasis that Los Angeles represented to an artist born and bred in the harsh north of England. Hockney explains: “Whenever I left England, colors got stronger in the pictures. California always affected me with color. Because of the light you see more color, people wear more colorful clothes, you notice it, it doesn’t look garish: there is more color in life here” (David Hockney, That’s the Way I See It, London 1993, p. 47). A wholly revolutionary representation of perspectival space that beckons the viewer into intimate acquaintance with the artist’s personal habitat, Pool and Pink Pole is a masterful example of the poignancy and bold compositional progress that defines Hockney’s radical works of the 1980s.

"After leaving his home in England in 1978 in search of new inspiration, Hockney ultimately settled in Los Angeles. The blue porch of his abode, which envelopes the scene rendered in the present work, is one of the most iconic motifs within the artist’s visual lexicon: a subject that the artist has returned to and reworked repeatedly. Hockney’s characteristic tendency to rework and exhaust a subject can be traced to this exact view, as the instigator for this habit. Not only constrained to painting, the consummate artist would also work with Polaroids in his investigation of this vantage point and its planes of saturated color.

"In Pool and Pink Pole, lines intersect the canvas at dramatically divergent angles; charismatic fields of colors collide and various compositional elements oscillate between the background and the foreground, conveying a prismatic sense of movement, much like Cézanne’s famed depictions of Mont Sainte Victoire or Pablo Picasso's revolutionary Cubist explorations of space. The pink pole in particular, central to the canvas, simultaneously divides and unites the canvas through its spatial ambiguity. The sweeping porch and corresponding awning act as a framing device, thereby placing the viewer in Hockney’s perspective. In so doing, there is not only a provocation for the audience’s emotional and visual association with the work, but one also becomes immersed in the artist’s explorative process. Pool and Pink Pole demands that the viewer experience it not as a static object, but rather as an active entity in a constant state of dynamism. Hockney wanted to “create a painting where the viewer’s eye could be made to move in a certain way, stop in certain places, move on, and in doing so, reconstruct the space across time for itself” (Lawrence Weschler, “A Visit with David Hockney,” in Exh. Cat., Los Angeles County Museum of Art, David Hockney, 1988, p. 93).

"As a master of both color and space, Hockney’s artistic lineage can be traced to the pioneering, turn-of the-century Fauvist movement, spearheaded by Henri Matisse. Painting with vivid brushstrokes and vibrant, raw colors that evoke paintings such as Matisse’s Interior with Egyptian Curtain (1948). Hockney’s superb understanding of color becomes clear. Both artists flattened space into numerous discrete planes, heightening the immediacy of the viewing experience. In Interior with Egyptian Curtain (1948), Matisse depicts the exterior world from the vantage point of a window but blurs this divide by having hints of blue and green paint penetrate the interior plane. Similarly, the landscape itself in Hockney’s work is eliminated by the lack of tonal and perspectival recession employed by the artist.

"Hockney himself attributes many of his artistic developments to the environment in which he lived and worked. “The winding road along which Hockney drove every day from his house in the Hollywood Hills to his studio on Santa Monica Boulevard came to symbolize for him his new experience of the city, and his now-elevated vantage point from the hilly heights rather than from the flat terrain that he had known during earlier sojourns. The pictorial shorthand that he devised for that heart-stopping experience of driving up and down Nichols Canyon was to prove decisive in shaping his notion of traveling through a landscape, and of reconstructing it through a succession of signposts lodged in the mind, that again became a vital constituent of his landscapes when he first painted Yorkshire in 1997” (Marco Livingstone, “The Road Less Traveled,” in Exh. Cat., London, Royal Academy of Arts (and traveling), David Hockney: A Bigger Picture, 2012, p. 34). As Hockney was being reinvigorated by his fresh surroundings, he in turn breathed new life into the once stagnant, historic tradition of landscape painting. It is this continual evolution of his practice throughout his almost sixty -year long career that has led Hockney to be universally celebrated as one of Britain’s greatest living artists, further affirmed by his comprehensive career retrospective at the Tate Britain, London in May 2017 and, subsequently, at the Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris and the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. Hockney’s innovative painterly techniques in Pool and Pink Pole come to focus in a landscape that was instrumental to revitalizing Hockney’s career; as such, this work forms the crux of a seminal moment for the octogenarian Brit.

"Initial observation may lend to the assumption that Hockney used his unique painterly techniques to forge an intensely colored and stylized scene in the manner of his Post-Impressionist predecessors. In fact, Hockney’s rendering of his home is remarkably accurate. He designed his Los Angeles home much in the same way that he composes his paintings: “What I am doing, slowly, is making my own environment—room by room—as artists do. Of course it's fun” (David Hockney in Constance Glenn, Artist David Hockney’s House on the West Coast, Architectural Digest, 1 April 1983). Hockney painstakingly and methodically composed an ideal environment for his artistic endeavors; then, in his painting process, he deconstructs the figuration and reassembles it with his unmistakable style. This enables a play with the viewer’s sensory perceptions: we instinctually grasp for what is familiar and recognizable, yet the abstraction and vibrant blocks of colors alter our pictorial expectations. The patterning of the surface of the pool, which could be perceived as representing ripples on water, is actually present in the stylistic design on the floor of the artist’s swimming pool, which he painted himself just two years before the execution of the present work. Pool and Pink Pole both embodies his famed stylistic characteristics, as well as gives viewers a glimpse into Hockney's intimate environment.

Straddling the line between an acute awareness of the art historical innovations of modern masters, such as Matisse and Cézanne, and a deep appreciation for his contemporary surroundings, Hockney fuses myriad references into an entirely new artistic practice. In the present work, we find the full exertion of Hockney’s quintessential playfulness and liberated gusto, revealing how the artist clearly delights in the spirited rendering of his familiar surroundings. As such, Pool and Pink Pole receives due placement as a pivotal work within Hockney's oeuvre."


The lot has an estimate of $1,800,000 to $2,500,000.  It sold for $3,140,000.



Twombly 109



Lot 109, "Death of Giuliano de Medici," by Cy Twombly, wax crayon, graphite and oil on canvas, 39 3/8 by 31 1/2 inches, 1962


Lot 109 is a good wax crayon, graphite and oil on canvas by Cy Twombly (1928-2012).  It measures 38 3/8 by 31 1/2 inches and was painted in 1962.  It is entitled "Death of Giuliano de Medici."

The catalogue provides the following commentary:


"He smears the color on with his fingers or applies it directly from the tube onto the canvas as a physical act: color becomes raw condition or ‘materia nuda,’ human presence of gods and heroes like flesh and blood in pink and red.”
Heiner Bastian, Cy Twombly: Paintings 1952-1976 Volume I, Berlin 1978, p. 43

Cy Twombly’s oeuvre has always been distinguished by the veritable pantheon of references that he has drawn on for inspiration. Nowhere were these horizons broadened more than in Italy, and specifically in Rome. Twombly moved to the Eternal City permanently in 1957 after a number of earlier trips to Italy, notably with Robert Rauschenberg in 1952. The sojourn was the result of Twombly’s application for a travel scholarship funded by the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts—already showing the early signs of Twombly’s enchantment with Italian culture that was to become fully-realized in his work of the 1960s. Indeed, the artist reflected on his first trips to Italy in no uncertain terms: “I will always be able to find energy and excitement to work with from these times. I see clearer and even more the things I left. It’s been like one enormous awakening of finding many wonderful rooms in a house that you never knew existed” (Cy Twombly quoted in Exh. Cat., New York, Museum of Modern Art, Cy Twombly: A Retrospective, 1995, p. 17).

1962 proved a pivotal year for Twombly’s artistic development; indeed, the decade as a whole was an early apex in the artist’s creative development.  Compositionally, dispersed 'narrative' was relinquished. Instead, forms began to gravitate increasingly towards a central vertical, and a more defined palette of reds and greys began to populate his canvases. Thematically, Twombly turned from the languorous ruminations on classical mythology of the previous year towards the creation of an anthology of impassioned works concerned with fallen heroes across time. While references to Ancient history abound in Twombly’s oeuvre, yielding such masterpieces as Death of Pompey and Leda and the Swan (both 1962), allusions to more recent, Renaissance history as seen the present work feature more elusively in the artist’s opus. A likely touchstone for this newfound emphasis on historical portraiture comingled with meditations on mortality was the artwork of Francis Bacon, yet Twombly added to works from this period a personal gloss of Baroque influences—at once decadent and decaying. 

The title of the present work makes explicit reference to the 1478 Pazzi conspiracy, a pivotal moment among the vicissitudes of Florentine history. The plot was helmed by members of the Pazzi and Salviati families, who were working on the assumption that by displacing the Medici family as rulers of Florence and by murdering its two patriarchs, Giuliano, the present work’s tragic eponymous hero, and Lorenzo, they would acquire political ascendancy. In fact, they were merely henchmen—puppets in Pope Sixtus IV’s effort to expand his sphere of influence. The chosen scene for the crime could not have been more spectacular: during High Mass on Easter Sunday 1478, 10,000 attendees witnessed Francesco de’ Pazzi and Bernardo Baroncelli stab Giuliano 19 times. While Lorenzo managed to escape with his life, Giuliano bled to death on the cathedral floor.

In the present work, one of 6 painted variations created in a flurry of artistic inspiration, a fevered storm of crimson takes center-stage and functions as an amalgamation of certainties and ambivalences—Twombly employs the universal signifier of violence (red) alongside the specificity of the historical episode and his own idiosyncratic visual language. The sedate grey of the background is almost ironic in its passivity to the action in the center, highlighting the fact that even the presence of 10,000 witnesses did not prevent the assassination attempt.

Just as New York had reached its ascendancy as the global art world capital and the most fertile ground for cultivating forward-thinking artists, Twombly instead decided to abandon it in favor of Rome, its monuments fossils of a former Empire and its present inhabitants struggling to rebuild themselves in the wake of Fascism and the Second World War. Yet, in his refusal to conform with his compatriots, Twombly was perhaps the most modern of all. While the New York artists’ field of creative vision encompassed almost exclusively their immediate surroundings, Twombly took the lessons he learnt from them—their self-mythologizing tendencies and insistent adoption of a personal visual grammar—and expanded their horizons into a wholly new idiom inspired by the history of the great Mediterranean cultures. While Pop art and Minimalism insistently rejected narrative and history, Twombly embraced and revitalized them.

"Although Twombly’s work resonates strongly with generations of younger artists, ranging from Brice Marden to Richard Prince to Tacita Dean to Patti Smith, it has a general propensity to polarize its audience between perplexity and unbridled admiration...The critical and historical reception has seemed to describe two Twomblys—one about form, the other about content. Some writers have concentrated on the materiality of the artist’s mark as aggressive, often illegible graffiti; others have followed the classical allusions to ferret out the references. However, Twombly’s painterly palimpsests trace the progressions through which form and content, text and image are inextricably linked” (Claire Dagle, “Cy Twombly: Lingering at the Threshold Between Word and Image,” Tate Etc., No. 13, Summer 2008, online). As Roberta Smith argues: “I doubt if any artist has shortened the distance between the brain and the hand as much as Twombly. He also radically shortened the distance between his mind and what stimulates it, putting us on unusually intimate terms with his sources and influences partly by internalizing them so thoroughly and so passionately” (Roberta Smith, “Rewriting History,” in Exh. Cat., New York, Hirschl & Adler Modern, Cy Twombly, 1986, n.p.).

"Death of Giulio de Medici marks an interstitial moment between the impassioned and scatological use of paint that typifies works directly inspired by bloody or amorous mythological tales, and the increasing restraint and graphic pre-eminence that came to characterize the works of the mid-to-late 1960s. Moving into the next phase of his career, fervent bodily evocations and base matter give way to the predominance of the pencil and graphic line, and thus we see a transition from Dionysian physicality into an Apollonian intellectualism. As Twombly stated in 2008 to Serota: “…paint is something that I use with my hands and so all those tactile things. I really don’t like oil because you can’t back into it. I mean it’s not my favorite thing, pencil is more my medium than wet paint” (the artist in conversation with Nicholas Serota, "History Behind the Thought," in Exh. Cat., London, Tate Modern (and traveling), Cy Twombly: Cycles and Seasons, 2008, p. 48). In the present work, the physicality of exuberant pigment—its thrown, smeared, finger-printed impasto application—is perfectly balanced against the lyrical pre-eminence of jotted words, graphic lines, and Mallarméan silence.

"Reflecting the way in which Freud and Jung identified a mirror for the unconscious in classical mythology, Twombly’s tableau of signs is entrenched within a wealth of classical archetypes. Twombly’s staggering innovation and inimitable abstract aesthetic are on full display through the work’s visceral imagery, compositional economy, and graphic intelligence, traits that appear so instinctive yet seemingly arbitrary. Indeed, Death of Giulio de Medici presents a mesmerizing paragon of Twombly’s pioneering interrogation of semiotic sign systems, a device strongly allied with Roland Barthes’ observation that “Whatever happens on the stage Twombly offers us (whether it is canvas or paper) is something which partakes of several kinds of event” (Roland Barthes quoted in Exh. Cat., New York, Whitney Museum of American Art, Cy Twombly: Paintings and Drawings 1954-1977, 1979, p. 9). 

"Cy Twombly frequently counterposes his high-minded culture references with a tangible emotional immediacy rooted in the physicality of his mark-making. Rebelling against New York’s hegemony over contemporary art world discourse, Twombly is an artist perpetually at the borders: between American and European, past and present, figuration and abstraction, feverishly visceral while always insistently cerebral."

It has an estimate of $1,800,000 to $2,500,000.  It sold for $2,180,000.


See The City Review article on the Fall 2018 Contemporary Art evening auction at Christie's New York
See The City Review article on the Fall 2018 Contemporary Art evening auction at Sotheby's New York
See The City Review article on the Spring 2018 Contemporary Art evening auction at Christie's New York
See The City Review article on the Spring 2018 Contemporary Art evening auction at Sotheby's New York
See The City Review article on the Fall 2017 Contemporary Art evening auction at Christie's New York
See The City Review article on the Spring 2017 Contemporary Art evening auction at Christie's New York
See The City Review article on the Spring 2017 Contemporary Art evening auction at Sotheby's New York
See The City Review article on the Fall 2016 Contemporary Art evening auction at Christie's New York
See The City Review article on the Spring 2016 Contemporary Art evening auction at Christie's New York

See The City Review article on the Spring 2016 Contemporary Art evening auction at Sotheby's New York
See The City Review article on the Fall 2015 Contemporary Art evening auction at Christie's New York

See The City Review article on the Fall 2015 Contemporary Art evening auction at Sotheby's New York
See The City Review article on the Spring 2015 Contemporary Art evening auction at Christie's New York
See The City Review article on the Spring 2015 Looking Forward to The Past auction at Christie's New York
See The City Review article on the Spring 2015 Impressionist and Modern Art auction at Sotheby's New York
See The City Review article on the Looking Forward to the Past auction May 11, 2015 at Christie's New York
See The City Review article on the Fall 2014 Impressionist & Modern Art auction at Christie's New York
See The City Review article on the Spring 2014 Impressionist & Modern Art auction at Sotheby's New York

See The City Review article on the Spring 2014 Impressionist & Modern Art auction at Christie's New York
See The City Review article on the Fall 2013 Impressionist & Modern Art auction at Sotheby's New York
See The City Review article on the Spring 2013 Impressionist & Modern Art auction at Christie's New York
See The City Review article on the Spring 2013 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Sotheby's New York

See The City Review article on the Fall 2012 Impressionist & Modern Art auction at Sotheby's New York
See The City Review article on the Fall 2012 Impressionist & Modern Art day auction at Sotheby's New York
See The City Review article on the Spring 2012 Impressionist & Modern Art auction at Sotheby's
See The City Review article on the Spring 2012 Impressionist & Modern Art auction at Christie's
See The City Review article on the Fall 2011 Impressionist & Modern Art auction at Sotheby's
See The City Review article on the Fall 2011 Impressionist & Modern Art auction at Christie's
See The City Review article on the Spring 2011 Impressionist & Modern Art auction at Sotheby's
See The City Review article on the Spring 2011 Impressionist & Modern Art auction at Christie's
See The City Review article on the Fall 2010 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Sotheby's
See The City Review article on the Fall 2010 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Christie's
See The City Review article on the Spring 2010 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Sotheby's
See The City Review article on the Spring 2010 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Christie's
See The City Review article on the Fall 2009 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Sotheby's
See The City Review article on the Fall 2009 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Christie's

See The City Review article on the Spring 2009 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Sotheby's
See The City Review article on the Spring 2009 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Christie's
See The City Review article on the Fall 2008 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Christie's
See The City Review article on the Fall 2008 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Sotheby's

See The City Review article on the Spring 2008 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Christie's
See The City Review article on the Spring 2008 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Sotheby's
See The City Review article on the Fall 2007 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Sotheby's
See The City Review article on the Spring 2007 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Christie's
See The City Review article on the Spring 2007 Impressionist & Modern Art auction at Sotheby's
See The City Review article on the Fall 2006 Impressionist & Modern Art auction at Sotheby's
See The City Review article on the Spring 2006 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Sotheby's
See The City Review article on the Spring 2006 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Christie's
See The City Review article on the Fall 2005 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Christie's
See The City Review article on the Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Sotheby's November 2, 2005
See The City Review article on the Impressionist & Modern evening sale at Sotheby's in the Spring, 2005
See The City Review article on the Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction in the Fall, November, 2005
See The City Review article on the Impressionist & Modern Art day auction at Sotheby's November 5, 2004
See The City Review article on the Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Christie's May 4, 2004
See The City Review article on the Impressionist & Modern Art day auction at Christie's May 5, 2004
See The City Review article on the May 5, 2004 evening auction at Sotheby's of Property of the Greentree Foundation from the Collection of Mr. and Mrs. John Hay Whitney
See The City Review article on the Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Sotheby's May 6, 2004
See The City Review article on the Spring 2004 Impressionist & Modern Art day auction at Sotheby's
See The City Review article on the Fall 2003 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Sotheby's
See The City Review article on the Fall 2003 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Christie's
See The City Review article on the Spring 2003 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Christie's
See The City Review article on Spring 2003 Impressionist & Modern Art day auction at Christie's
See The City Review article on the Spring 2003 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Sotheby's
See The City Review article on the Spring 2003 Impressionist & Modern Art Part 2 day auction at Sotheby's
See The City Review article on the Fall 2002 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Sotheby's
See The City Review article on the Fall 2002 Impressionist & Modern Art evening auction at Phillips de Pury & Luxembourg
See The City Review article on the Spring 2002 Impressionist & Modern Art day auction at Christie's
See The City Review article on the Spring 2002 Impressionist Art evening auction at Sotheby's
See The City Review article on the Spring 2002 Impressionist Art Part Two day auction at Sotheby's
See The City Review article on the Nov. 5, 2001 auction of the Smooke Collection at Phillips de Pury & Luxembourg
See The City Review article on the Nov. 5, 2001 auction of the Hoener Collection at Phillips de Pury & Luxembourg
See The City Review article on Phillips May 7, 2001 Impressionist & Modern Art auction
See The City Review article on the November 9, 2001 Impressionist & Modern Art auction at Sotheby's
See The City Review article on Phillips Fall 2000 Impressionist & Modern Art auction
See The City Review article on the Christie's evening sale of Impressionist and Post-Impressionist Art May 8, 2000
See The City Review article on the Christie's evening sale of Twentieth Century Art May 9, 2000


Use the Search Box below to quickly look up articles at this site on specific artists, architects, authors, buildings and other subjects

Home Page of The City Review